Essay Title: 

Uniform Electronics Transactions Act

April 3, 2016 | Author: | Posted in law

p Uniform Electronics Transactions Act

Who .The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and the American Law Institute promulgated The Uniform Electronics Transactions Act (UETA ) in 1999 . What . The UETA represents one of the first comprehensive efforts to create uniformity and introduce certainty in State Laws pertaining to E-commerce . The primary purpose of the UETA is to remove barriers to e-commerce by giving the same legal effects to electronic records and signatures as is currently given to documents and signatures (Cross and Miller , 2004 ,

.417 . The proposed act [banner_entry_middle]

was issued to i ) facilitate electronic transactions consistent with other applicable law , ii ) to be consistent with reasonable practices concerning electronic transactions and with the continued expansion of those practices , and iii ) to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to electronic business (Bohlman and Dundas 2002 ,

.302 . Under the Uniform Electronics Transactions Act (UETA “a contract may be formed by the interaction of electronic devices even if no individual was aware of or reviewed the electronic devices actions or the resulting terms and agreements (Stuckey ,

.1

This measure , the product of several years consideration by NCCUSI builds on the international consensus established by the model law and contains specific provisions that the states can use to remove based barriers to electronic transactions . There are at least several noteworthy features of the UETA . Firstly , it is a minimalist law that provides for the legal recognition of electronic records , electronic signatures , and other electronic documentations , but does not establish any benefits for certain kinds to technologies or methods . As a result of this and other factors , the UETA will likely remain a flexible durable , and appropriate framework for electronic transactions for a significant period of time (Pincus , 2000 ,

.12

The first draft of the statute was long and complex , but during the course of drafting process , the statute progressively become simpler , as many complex provisions governing liability for attribution procedures and other issues often addressed in electronic signature were removed The final product was a clear , succinct statute that succeeds in using media neutral language to eliminate obvious obstacles to electronic commerce without favouring any particular technology or process . This Uniform Law continues to make its way through state legislatures , and served as the foundation of the Federal e-sign Act (Winn and Right br

.11

Users . The UETA will not apply to a transaction unless each of the parties has agreed to conduct transactions by electronic means . In the statements that accompany the UETA , the drafter states that it may be reasonable to infer that a person who gives out a business card with an e-mail address on it has consented to transact business electronically The party ‘s agreement may also be inferred from a letter or other writing as well as from some verbal communication . Nothing in the UETA requires that the agreement to conduct transactions electronically be made electronically . According to this law , a person who has previously agreed to… [banner_entry_footer]

Author:

This author has published 9453 articles so far. More info about the author is coming soon.
Did you like this essay sample?

You must be logged in to post a comment.